so I think I'll just go and start there's a lot of stuff to cover in bronchoscopy but I'm gonna skip over
some of the unnecessary details so at the end of the day if you can remember maybe I don't know 50% of it I think
you'll be fine it's that dense not for Delap alright so bronchoscopy so this is the general
Outline
outline of our talk we'll talk about brief history open-casket it's actually
very interesting talking for me because the history of bronchoscopy is is incredible then we'll talk about the
tracheobronchial tree some points about sedation and anesthesia then diagnostic bronchoscopy and this is where we spend
most of our time the therapeutic bronchoscopy is really like an IP talk I'll introduce this idea of functional
bronchoscopy this is a term and some concepts that are still out there and being tested and then a few things about
how we train and check for bronchoscopy competencies so you probably have seen
History
this picture before I want can you turn the lights down a little bit please thank you so this is dr. Gustav Killian
from Austria who was actually an ENT surgeon and he's the first one who
performed bronchoscopy in in the complete sense of the world there are a lot of people who tried before that
bronchoscopy was always important or people who thought about it because for
decades and centuries diphtheria tuberculosis and foreign body aspiration
were universally fatal so anyone who had any kind of medical inclination was thinking about how to approach the
airway so dr. Gustav Killian did the first bronchoscopy in a patient with
tracheostomy in 1896 and then that led to a lot of other advancements and other
procedures like he did fluoroscopy he used fluoroscopy he you at least tried
putting stents and he pulled out the first foreign body and then he also used
radiotherapy so he's really considered the father of bronchoscopy he trained
dr. Jackson and he's the doctor Jackson who came up with a Jackson trach
Dr Jackson
so dr. Jackson learned from him and then brought bronchoscopy to North America and a lot of things that today we take
for granted like having a dedicated staff having some kind of bee procedure intra procedure post procedure follow-up
having a you know an exception in the bronchoscopy light all those things that
we now take for granted were actually thought of and written by dr. Jackson he
was very you know very nice academician so this is dr. Jackson who's considered
the father of American Bronco II Sophie ology and then dr. Kubo he also learned
Dr Kubo
from dr. Killian and brought bronchoscopy Penh and Japan is important
in bronchoscopy because the first flexible bronchoscopy was invented in Japan so what dr. Jackson did in North
America is more or less what dr. Kubo did in Japan and the bronchoscopy were
done in the Killian chair and I'll show you a picture of the Killian chair basically a chair that had a little bit
of a depressed bottom so that patient had to sit with his neck up and you had to put the scope straight down but he
you know he modified that as well so
it's a little fun fact I didn't want I don't have that clicker that always forget that part but little historical fun fact who
discovered the anesthetic effect of cocaine why is cocaine important it's very
important right from both the doctors and patients standpoint but see when when bronchoscopy was being designed the
three biggest challenges to bronchoscopy was a nasty yeah light and instrument
and the the history of bronchoscopy so interesting because it's all started in
Europe they had to wait an entire year where light was just enough and just right for like 15 minutes in a day and
they would be able to look at you know something for like 15 minutes like the vocal cord there was an opera singer who
actually looked at his vocal cords while singing that was like the first live ENT
procedure so cocaine was important as an anesthetic but who's the first one
who designed or discovered the effects doctor gustaaf killing and dr. Osler Sigmund Freud
dr. Tinsley or the cashier at my local 7-eleven Sigmund Freud yes
the Sigmund Freud was a nobody and he trying to get someone to get married
actually and during that process you know he was actually using cocaine to detox morphine addicts and what during
the process he found out that actually cocaine is a good anesthetic but he didn't take it seriously he's alright
who cares so he told it to one of his friends who was an ophthalmologist and off-model just needed a good topical anesthetic so
that often is presented that work in one of the international societies and became famous for bringing cocaine as an
anesthetic and Sigmund Freud lost his chance but he became famous among the reasons so dr. Sigmund okay these two
Bronchoscopy History
are important people in the history bronchoscopy this was dr. akkada who's the inventor of flexible be 1968 in
Japan and that's dr. Du Monde the guy who the demand stand from France
he started flexible bronchoscopy he started intervention pulmonology in the contemporary sense of the world
okay this is the first flexible bronchoscope by dr. Ikeda so it had a
little eyepiece and this is this is sort of the timeline that tells you the history bronchoscopy so for many many
Bronchoscopy Timeline
many years actually some deck is rigid bronchoscopy was the only thing that and
there were not that many people who were doing it and then in 1966 gave me
none today actually started because flexible Binkowski became on the field
now IBAs and navigation bronchoscopy came around like 2000 2001 since then
things have been slow and a lot of work is being done and sort of fine tweaking this advanced from cost copies this
timeline over here is you know a little bit empty but this just how one
advancement area can just spawn an entire field of inventions this is how
Killian Chair
bronchoscopy was done this the Killian chair I don't know if you can see it this is dr. Gustav Killian this is I
think a medical student or somebody is passing by and then this is the patient
slash volunteer and this is I guess they call him conscious sedation so that's
how it was done I mean a little bit of cocaine and then that's it right nothing else but this is what bronchoscopy has
Bronchoscopy Suite
come so now you have a bronchoscopy suite with obviously all kinds of
advanced equipment your electrocardiogram terapy balloons super d or navigation you have IBAs see
a lot of fluorescence you have stands and APC and you know a lot more so bronchoscopy the history of on cost
could be is actually very very interesting not just from the technologic standpoint but also historical standpoint and I like this
History of Bronchoscopy
dr. Becker from Jeremy wrote a very nice book chapter on the history of endoscopy and bronchoscopy and there's some
interesting quotes from how bronchoscopy was first perceived when the for idea of
bronchoscopy was presented at the New York Academy of Sciences by dr. Horace green in 1846 this is this is what the
reviewers said monstrous assumption the ludicrously absurd and physically
impossible and anatomic impossibility and unwarrantable innovation in practical
medicine see reviewers used to be so subtle in those days you know now it's just like and then dr. Gerstein who was
actually a gastroenterologist he was trying to do a an EGD and accidentally ended up in the trachea and so he was
the first one accidentally see live tricky and I like the word is this almost like you know
he's an O because he saw the trachea and a live patient he said I convinced myself that one can pass the vocal cords
intentionally with a middle-sized saw he so fingers come into the coconut trachea and right down to the bifurcation but
the region of the low trachea is a very dangerous place the rhythmic protrusions of its wall is
a regular and all inspiring phenomenon so sometimes I remember these because it tells you know how far we have come we
just go through the vocal cord and boom boom boom right laughs you know but for someone who did it for the first time it
was just like you know Neil Armstrong landing on moon and this is from I think
somebody wrote a comment and I don't know if this is serious or not but it looked pretty serious to me because it's in this book he said these robots might
undergo an evolution from mirror machine to transcendent mind and therefore run out of control and he said I advise to
refrain completely from their development or at least perform some elements in outer space far from our
planet anyway anyway so that's just a little history so it's important to know
Vocal Cords
these structure most of the time when we go in and we look at the vocal cord we just look at the vocal cords put some
lidocaine sometimes there can be pathology right and left and you have the false vocal cords or the you know
the vestibular fold and then you have the true vocal cords so looking at the vocal cords how they're moving or their trophic or not sometimes you'll see
glottic webs which are basically thin strands between the the vocal cords those can be important but most of the
time we don't pay a lot of attention here because most of the pathology that you find here cannot really be treated
by us we can't really biopsy them and I generally advise even say you have a mass or a Polock here do not biopsy it
because if you end up bleeding in the upper airway and you are nowhere to control it you can end up in a lot of
trouble so if you find some major pathology you take some pictures it'd be a good description and then move on all
tracheobronchial tree
right a little bit about the tracheobronchial tree and this is important for patients to know or
for us to describe to the patient and I'll tell you why so the tracheobronchial trees are 23 generation
airway like the trachea as of generation 0 then right left bronchi which is first generation then lobar bronchus second
and segmental bronchi third generations three main landmarks in the bronchi as you know one is the crown are the most
prominent landmark one is the right minor karana also called RC one and then the left minor karana also called LC
bond why is it important because say you have a patient coming in with hemoptysis
and has an unremarkable chest CT and you say we're gonna do when cause could be on you right so this trachea bronchial
tree is a pretty extensive 23 generations and with the normal scope
you can only examine up to a third of it Thanks so you have ultra thin
bronchoscope that can take you a lot further but the optics and the suction starts to suffer so you can't really see
much so it's important for us to describe to the patient that we're going to look in your major Airways but if we
don't find anything it does not mean there is nothing there because there could be something in the 8 9 10 to 12
generation bronchus that we did not see the good thing is that if you can see
the central Airways which are the areas that you are able to look at with the scope and you don't see anything major
the chances that you actually miss this significant pathology are pretty low but still it's important for patients to
know that there could be something pretty distal I'm gonna skip this now this is just to let you know that
there's this Japanese classification of the tracheobronchial tree they go over b1 b2 I have not found any reason so far
to know this and there was a time when I knew this and then I honestly forgot it
because I never had to use this so I honestly don't think that you really need to worry about it I cannot remember
any any physician calling me or any surgeon telling me hey there's a problem the b1 a you know it's always right
upper lobe right lower lobe right middle oh so I will want you to just you know forget it just know that it's there
trachea
sometimes when we put valves in that becomes a little bit more important this is mainly for people who do
they're appearing interventions but just to let you know that the
trachea is about 10 to 12 centimeter long in an average male the trach
emitter close to 20 in an average female close to 50 and it's important because
if you see tracheal stenosis you need to have an idea of how bad it is usually patients start having symptoms when the
tracheal diameter is less than 50 percent of normal so if you see something that's really tight you need
to have an idea what the normal diameter was we know that the right mainstem bronchus is much shorter and it's a more
in line with the right of it the trachea that's why food generally aspirated food generally goes to the right side the
left mainstem bronchus is much longer and then the other segmental airways are much smaller so this is what I was
referring to this your regular bronchoscope I think most of the olympus scopes in diameter are close to about
five point eight to six millimeter so they can only take you up to maybe the
fourth and fifth generation scope and then with your camera you can see another one or one two three generations
so you cannot really see about a third of the tracheobronchial tree with the ultra thin scope you can go much farther
but then your optics start to get smaller your suction channel starts to get smaller so vision does suffer this
anatomic variations
is also important not because it's of any major you know like pathologic
significance but sometimes you see a lot of anatomic variations and you almost
wonder if this is some kind of an abnormality now these are some studies most of them were done in the
Mediterranean population aya Greece Turkey and they found that there are 20
different anatomic variations of the tracheobronchial tree and based on the population some of them would have you
know 43% of the population will have some variant of the tracheobronchial
tree the most common site I think most of you who have done because copy you'll see that the right upper lobe is anytime
you go in most of the time it's you know two segments are fused together there you know maybe an extra segment we have
a patient who actually has almost like a separate right upper lobe that basically - right upper lobes left upper
lobe is another common site of anatomic variation right middle ohm and lingula almost never have any what is the
significance of it probably resection is one so if somebody's doing a sleeve
resection for lung cancer and then the say the right mainstem bronchus is very
short it can be difficult long transplant is also important then people who do therapy ring and dimensions like
you're putting a brachytherapy catheter for lung cancer if the segment is very short very distorted it can come into
play but generally it's just an interesting finding I will just want you to know that you'll encounter it every
common findings
now and then part about some of the findings that you see in the central air
base during bronchoscopy what is this saber sheath trachea a very common
finding of little to no clinical significance but I can I cannot tell you
how many patients get referred to me for this because somebody out there did AB
wrong because there was a COPD patient and it's some kind of respiratory problem and they did a blog and they saw this and they refer the patient for
stent placement because you know there's tracheal stenosis this is basically patients who are old who are very frail
who have been smoking who've been on steroids their lateral wall of the cartilage becomes weak so every time
they breathe out or cough the lateral walls come in and it looks like you know an troposphere slit that's called a
sabre sheet trachea or a sable sable trachea really of no clinical significance this is another one of
those things that you'll see quite commonly it was a finding that was generally ignored but now there's a lot
of literature on it excessive dynamic airway collapse where the posterior wall of the trachea bulges in with coughing
and forced expression and again this is a situation where they'll send patients
for stent placement most of the time this is because of small Airways disease
or obesity so you don't generally treat it unless you've ruled out all of the
causes this is a little difficult to see but this is you can think of it as an advanced
edik this is tricky bronchial Malaysia where you have weakening of the tracheal
cartilage along with weakening of the posterior wall so there's concentric
constriction of the trachea so these are common observations and are now more commonly described you will see these
two and COPD patients or patients with have small Airways disease like asthma and you will see this in patients who
have primary cartilage problems so this is a little picture that describes different kinds of what's called central
central airway collapse
airway collapse which includes edik and trachea bronchi Malaysia together so this is normal trachea postie membranous
wall with the C shaped cartilage edik or dynamic airway collapse which is normal with when the posterior membrane bulges
in if it bulges in more than usual and what is more than usual is again debated some people say more than 50 percent
some people say up to 90 percent but clearly if it's it's if it's very obvious you'll see it
that's called eid AK and then you have different types of tracheobronchial Malaysia we talk about the stable sheath
trachea where the lateral walls are weak then this is the interior where it's
just the anterior wall and then concentric if this is if something like
this is found during bronchoscopy the question arises are the patient's bistec
because of this or is this just a finding from the small Airways disease and that's all question to answer
sometimes you have to put a stent in and relieve these kinds of central airway obstruction if patients feel better it
means that the obstruction was partly because of it a little about sedation
sedation and anesthesia
and anesthesia and honestly it is not my favorite topic but studies keep coming out on this nobody lets go of this
subject so I feel obligated to at least touch on it what do you use for sedation
a lot of people have used all kinds of medicines the most common and if you
look at the ACCP garden and they'll say some kind of benzodiazepine and some kind of narcotic most Pithom is fentanyl
and midazolam which is what we use here there are studies with etomidate their studies if ketamine
their studies did propofol I don't think anybody uses cocaine but you know we
generally use lidocaine there are other other medicines that have been trialed
most of them are expensive difficult to administer but does it even matter which
sedation you use you would think that if patients were better sedated we would be
sedation studies
able to do better bronchoscopy that's that's what you know we think having
said that none of the studies that have been done have actually shown it these
studies have not been done in basic philosophy most of these were done in advanced bronchoscopy like IBAs and
navigation because over there you generally tend to spend more time than basic than cost appear so there was a
study in 2009 where model sedation was tried against deep sedation this was
retrospective and again there was no difference in Eavis there was a nun study 2010 again looking at IBAs good
patient satisfaction there was this one study from this is from Johns Hopkins 2013 where there was
a little higher yield eighty percent versus sixty-six percent and more lymph
nodes could be sampled with deep sedation versus model sedation there was a lot of criticism on this study and
even Lonnie Ormus who did the study wasn't very satisfied with the results Roberto Casal from UT Houston this is
the only prospective study in bronchoscopy that has looked at sedation
so they randomized patients to IBAs and a patient's either got moderate sedation
with fentanyl versus versed versus general anesthesia and they found that
there was no difference in either diagnostic yield or major complication or patient tolerance I think the only
important point about this is that there were no innies involved in this study and I think below is actually looking at
our data in at the VA because we do general anaesthesia or model sedation
and I think if we get some data that will be the first time this will be
looked at in a training set right there was another study in 2016
which again looked at IBAs smarter sedation versus deep sedation there was
no difference so I think honestly when it comes to sedation general anesthesia
is better because it allows more time for the trainees to you know learn
bronchoscopy having said that from the patient's perspective it doesn't make a difference all right so I briefly
therapeutic bronchoscopy
discussed the diagnostic therapeutic and functional part of bronchoscopy so these
are important terms you know you you want to know if you're doing mainly diagnostic on cost could be diagnostic
plus therapeutic or just reputed and then we'll talk about functional bronchoscopy what's the simplest
therapeutic bronchoscopy that you can do yeah suck out a mucus plug we don't
think of it as therapeutic and cost to be because most of it's so effortless you know it's just like routine you go
and you see some goo you suck it out done right but that is really therapeutic bronchoscopy right but then
you can expand that concept to a lot of things that that are done in the IP world okay I put these pictures because
biopsy
this is important what is this fellow's
biopsy forceps what is this or a needle right what is
this brush the reason I'm bringing this up is because I cannot tell you how many
times when I go in in G gastro editing the the note that the fellow has put in
they if he did an F na they say FN a biopsy was done or brush biopsy was done
right and then I get a call from billing and they say did you do an F an A or a
biopsy right so biopsy is a separate
procedure this is not a biopsy this is an F and a not a biopsy
brush dr. Saad will tell you three one six two eight three one six two five
three one six two nine and three one six two three okay so please if if you see
Amy takes something out like this not a biopsy brush if you do something like
this not a biopsy needle fna TB na if you do
something like this if you're using fluoroscopy it's trash rocky o if you're biting something that you can see it's
endo bronchial alright okay so let's go
diagnostic techniques
through these some of these basic diagnostic techniques this is really what's important for this lecture right the diagnostic part of bronchoscopy so
we know for central endo bronchial again you can do a lot of different things you can do an FN a bronco wash brush for
self or peripheral lesions you can again use biopsy Force a brush curette which nobody really use it I think the
Japanese somehow our you know foreign of it pls and then you can do key BNA and
then the hilar lymph nodes and mediastinal structures you can use either the psychology needle which is
you 21 22 gauge or the histology needle which is using 19 gauge so I'm not going
to go through all of this but you know some of the important points are highlighted for central endo bronchial lesion what is an endo bronchial lesion
something you can see right if it's in the central area if you can see it on
your scope that's an endo bronchial lesion and generally you can either biopsied with force and there are all
kinds of forceps usually at the VA Susie will ask you do you want alligator or
alligator with a spike or cut you know and depending on my mood I will say whatever right why because there's no
study that is shown that one is better than the other way as far as diagnostic yield is concerned if it's something
that you think you really need to bite hard then you know choose something with the spike or with an alligator jaw
larger forceps can give you larger tissue but that doesn't translate into better yield and also with things like
small cells sometimes larger forces will give you a bigger crush artifact which at the VA
is a big deal cause you can send them 36 pieces and those sisters tell you not enough tissue okay so if you think it's
smoke sale just be a little gentle okay do not crush to you sensitivity for
biopsy in central lesions is pretty good 90% you want to take at least four biopsies the data will tell you there's
no increase afterwards the problem is most of this data comes from the pre molecular studies you know they weren't
looking at immunohistochemical stains they weren't doing their EGFR they weren't doing foundation bond so if it's
easy to buy it it doesn't bleed just get as many pieces as you want then remember
that if you're doing biopsies of renal cell carcinoma in the lungs or Kappa C's or carcinoid you want to be a little
careful because they can bleed a lot of people do brushing for central and
brush
abroad collisions and data will tell you that you can get up to 72 percent on the
the what the problem is brush we brush it's just like you're rubbing on the lesion and lot of endo bronchial lesions
have a thick coat of necrotic tissue so if you just go in and brush right away
you're all you're getting is the superficial necrotic tissue so just be just be careful the best thing to do is
to do a brush after you actually dug into the lesion and expose the underlying tissue if you're gonna do a
brush bronc wash is really the next to worthless when it comes to endo
bronc wash
bronchial Asians I gently get washes after I've done everything and there's a lot of you know blood and secretions and
potentially cancer cells in the airway because again it's about getting more tissue and bronk wash it's generally a
very easy and harmless thing to do so if you want to get a bronc wall just put
like 30 40 50 whatever cc's of water on it after you have done everything and then you can send it TBN a that's the
needle part right what's the good thing about TB na in endo bronchial lesions
they and pierced the lesion right so you can get to the core of an endo broccoli
tumor and get tissue from underneath that's why the the heal is pretty good
about ninety-one percent plus potentially potentially it is less
traumatic to lesion so if you have renal cell carcinoma or Kappa C's or Carson or that you think is going to bleed it's
good to do a needle aspirate first so say you do a bronchoscopy on a patient
bronchoscopy
is they actually one of the patients who referred to us for Center labeled obstruction so you do a bronchoscopy you
put a scope in you're looking down the trachea got this huge big mass just blocking the left mainstem you can see a
little bit of the right mainstem what do you think I this is again it's not hard and fast but new generally this is you
know what I want you to remember what is the most appropriate sequence of tissue sampling for the mass seen in this
picture you'll do a brush first then endo broccoli boxes and fna or fna with
endo Bronco biopsy then brush or in the broccoli biopsy F and a brush wash brush transmog Popsy dr. price
so it's - its - I told you with a brush if you rub the brush on it what are you
gonna get this mucus and junk right and at the VA we already struggle with large
tumors to get a diagnosis you don't want to send the mucus and junk and tell them there was a tumor so the the get the
best thing will be you go and you don't know if this thing is gonna bleed it could or it may not right so the best thing is you stick a
needle in there with an F na get the core of it put it on a slide give it to your psychopathologies which is right
there he gives your diagnosis you can maybe do another one or two and then you can biopsy it so with endo bronchial
lesions the first thing that you want to do if you'd really suspecting malignancy
which matter time we are with endo brach to be here you want to go with an F na first okay it's less traumatic gets you
the core you can put it on a slide get a rapid on site cytology you can even
check if it's gonna be it or not and then go with the biopsy and like I said the brush if you're going to do it for
endo broccoli and just make sure there's a lot of you know blood and secretions in their way because potential there will be cancer cells then but brush is
really less important but always remember fna before endo broccoli box
and this is generally you know this is emphasizing the fat for benign lesions and overarching lesions generally are
approached as malignant we're very rarely use you know find that there have been i've benign tumors of the airway
are very uncommon so with benign lesion you can really follow any sequence we generally just go
straight for forceps but if it's the malignantly and if it's a tumor you stick a needle in first and then forceps
okay what about peripheral lesions like out in the periphery you can either use IBAs like radially burrs or navigation
or fluoroscopy so with peripheral lesions as you have noticed there's a
lot of difficulty getting to the lesion and if you have gotten to the lesion getting biopsy why is that because
obviously you're dealing with a 23 generation tracheobronchial tree and fluoroscopy is
to the image so it cannot tell you if you're in front of the légion behind the
Delian or in the legion it can tell you that you know you're in terms of
superior inferior and median lateral it can tell you where you are but cannot tell you here in front of it or behind
it unless you rotate the fluoroscope so size of peripheral pommy lesions and the
distance from the hilum is something that really determines if you're gonna be able to biopsy just remember if it's
a 2 centimeter or smaller lesion in the outer third of the lung on fluoroscopy
the chances of getting a biopsy with fluoroscopy alone is about 20% or less
and this based on studies I think published in 2001 and she has very nice study now with navigation and guided
bronchoscopy we have been able to increase this number to about 70 75 %
all the guided bronchoscopy in a very well-done meta-analysis whether you use
radial IBAs radially bus with navigation navigation alone really leave us with distance what they call a relievers with
God God sheath or any combination of those Jen Lee gets you to about 70
percent so that's the number that you should remember when I talk to patients about these peripheral visions I say I
we have about a 70 75 percent chance of getting the diagnosis so that means
about 1/3 of the times we may not get the no diagnosis so talking about
non-diagnostic bronch is it's very important because no test gives you 100%
result pbn a 4-perf Allegiant I can if you can get to it has a very good yield
and most people will say go with the key DNA first why is that doctor do you why
do you think a TB na at least in theory will give you a better diagnostic yield
than a force biopsy for a peripheral pulmonary lesion so this is what we have found remember
that timeline where we were you know we were going on this path of innovation and AD right mm it just sort
of stopped well what happened so in 2000 radiant 2000 1999 ready Libas came out
them were designed to take us to the lesion right and all of all of the
people who are working on in this area were thinking if we can get to the lesion we will get the diagnosis while
what they realize in by late 2000 after all these studies that come out is that getting to the lesion was half of the
problem because what really determines whether you will be able to get a diagnosis at that point when you're
there close to the lesion is the relationship of the lesion with the airway so if the lesion is in in series
like right you know the arrow is going right into it then your diagnosis
diagnostic yield is higher you can put the forceps it's going to follow that guy teeth and they go right at the lesion but if the lesion is parallel to
the airway well with your radial EBUS you're going to be seeing through the airway and you'll feel like you're there
but when you put the four step your four step is in the airway while your lesion is right next to it so that's the that's
the biggest explanation perhaps for the 70 percent yield along with the fact
that you're you have respiratory motion so what the needle can give you potentially is a way to traverse the
airway at that point so it can go through the airway and get you to the lesion whereas a forceps cannot so all
most of the innovation that has been done in guided bronchoscopy since that
time is basically working in that part trying to come up with instruments that
can somehow take you to the lesion or you can tell you if with respiration the
lesion is moving or not bl4 for peripheral Palmilla lesions is if you're
looking at malignancies practically worthless unless unless you have
lymphocytic carcinomatosis or one of those minimally invasive and no carcinoma so if you have what looks like
minimally invasive adenocarcinoma or lymphatic carcinomatosis
and patients are pretty sick they cannot tolerate a biopsy just go ahead and do a BL and you'll be surprised how many
times it will actually come back positive so in that case BL can be helpful
there's something called a bronchus sign where on a CT you can see an airway
going to a lesion with navigation bronchoscopy there's one study at least
that showed that if you can see something like this it increases the of your biopsy with radial Eva's there is
no such study but intuitively you would think that if there's an airway going to the lesion that's pretty good so if you
can see something like this and again this is a situation but you want to decide if bronchoscopy is the right
route to get to it or is it a transthoracic biopsy so if you see something like this and patient is a
decent candidate for from Koska B then you have a good chance of getting to the
lesion because trans lassie barks you although it's relatively simple straightforward does carry a much higher risk for pneumothorax about 15% as
opposed to about five six percent for bronchoscopy again with peripheral pommy
lesions if you're suspecting cancer go with a TB na first if you can this is based on some weak data so whether the
the lesion is endo bronchial or peripheral and you're suspecting cancer try to go with the needle first and then
the forceps this is something that I think I'm gonna skip you generally learn
it this is the mediastinal lymph node staging you generally learn it when you're doing EBUS so the cause of this
talk is not to make you a good bronchoscopy is but a smart bronchoscopy so this bronchoscopy is not something
you're going to learn on this table but a few things about the hilar mediastinal lymph node they used to call this blind
T V na or conventional TB na which is now rarely done so I feel like this
slide has become somewhat redundant it's just of historical importance
the diagnostic heal as you can see is 15% to 80% like all over the place and
the reason is that a lot of it depends on the the skill of the operator a lot
of it depends on how big the lymph nodes are this is where IBAs has really made a
huge difference basically kicked this thing out of the you know the practical medicine if you're gonna do a lymph node
aspirate the main question is how many times should you ask for the lesion based on many studies up to four passes
maximizes the yield beyond that there's very little increase in in your yield so try to do about
three to four passes if you can with EBUS it's a really different picture but if you're if for whatever reason you end
up doing a conventional or blind pbn a try to get at least four passes and then
when you're doing a sampling of the lymph node what is most important is to
number one sample the lymph node before you sample the cancer and always go for
the lesion that is going to give you the highest stage if it were positive so say
that that tumor that we found if you go straight for it now you spit cancer
cells in the airways and now if you go and biopsy a lymph node and comes back positive the bigger question will be
well is it positive because the airways were contaminated or is it possibly because the lymph node is positive so I
always try to go for the lymph nodes before you sample the air the D tube
little I guess this is my least favorite procedure to do in Akasaka B the BL and
and then I'll tell you the reason because I feel like you have no control
as a bronchoscopy on how much you're gonna get out with everything else there
are things you can do you can try even tweak things up and down and try to get
a better yield with BL it's like you're the victim of circumstances right you
pull it in and you suck out and then you realize how bad you suck
so but there is one study this is important so they've done this digital subtraction radiography to see how much
water you actually need really get the added part of it and this was interesting for me because you need
about 120 cc's to really get to the alveoli otherwise if you put about 60
CCS which is generally what we do because you know at the VA our patients are old and frail BL is really
controlled drowning that's what it is so how much how much drowning can a patient take depends on who the patient is right
you've got a 25 year old otherwise healthy patient you can't pour like 200 300 cc's in as long and he'll do fine
but you got one of those 87 year old on two liters oxygen bad long than you
email it's not do well after 40 cc's so really you have to judge yourself but
you do have to remember that you do need to pour close to hundred cc's you're really gonna get the alveolar part of it
and then we've seen this all all the fellows know it all those collapsible Airways will you suck it a little bit
and it just closes down on you there's really no there is no way you can get a good B L on it if you are doing a BL for
a diffused lung disease plot the right middle lobe and the lingual are just because the orientation of those
segments is such that you actually pour it in and you suck it up so you get a better return otherwise if it's a focal
lesion you'll have to go in that segment this is something that I always tell
patients because you will be surprised how many times patients will call you back and say I have a little fever so BA
L can actually cause a low-grade inflammatory reaction in the lungs and it's very common for patients who have
low-grade fever so when you're getting consent for patients always tell them that in low-grade fever after
bronchoscopy does not that you have a pneumonia and they can take tylenol for
usually about 24-48 hours it's it's gone yield in bronchoscopy in BL for
fungal infections
bacterial pneumonias can be up to 75% TB up to 70% but loan in malaria TB
one study looked at BL yield in bacterial pneumonias on patients who were already on antibiotics and they
found about 40% which was a little a surprise for me and then fungal infections anywhere from fifteen to
eighty percent depending on many factors including the fungus some fungus his you
know easy to grow others are not so I generally remember about fifty percent I tell the patients there's about fifty
percent chance of finding the organism and if you look at pneumonia data generally about 50% of the pneumonias
our culture negative what is the normal composition of the elbe no it's more
like mostly macrophages and it's larger in smokers some may have inclusion bodies and then
the cd4 cd8 ratio is important which disease causes the reversal of cd4 cd8
ratio Arjun sarcoid so sarcoidosis cd4
cd8 ratio the cd4 cells will be much higher cd8 to the little in in HP it's
the reverse that's why it helped because both of them can be granulomatous both of them can have lymphocytes at the BL
and at the hospital I've worked with the Hema
they have a special order for us now so if you're suspecting I'll D of any sort
and you want to actually just specifically check cd4 cd8 ratio the nurses down there know to put the flow
cytometry order on the BL two to eight and they'll send it and you get the results within 24 hours so it helps
again this is not something I'm gonna go into but just remember that sarcoidosis
and hypersensitive pneumonitis both have high lymphocytes in the BL which one of
these these diseases has the highest lymphocyte count sarcoid is actually second it's actually
HP HP has a very high lymphocyte count is that right that's right right yes HP has the
highest lymphocyte count sarcoidosis is a close second okay so you're asked to
Bronchoscopy in aneutropenic patient
perform bronchoscopy in a neutropenic patient with diffuse forming infiltrate dr. C says I want it done today
right he's suspected of having pneumonia which of the following modalities
provides the highest yield in this patient BL alone be ultra plus trans
bronchial BL flex transport give us brush dbx alone rush alone tbh bx+ brush this
is important too it's far too often be missing dr. de Lappe - very good so this
is this is based on this study published in chess 2004 non HIV immunocompromised patient with prominent infiltrate so
they looked at all these combinations and they were trying to find out which one of these combinations gives you the
highest diagnostic yield no this is patients with with suspected infection and so they found out that BL press
trans molecule box he gave you about a 70 percent yield what was important to know is that adding a brush really
didn't make any difference so doing brush you know out in the lung when you're suspecting pneumonia is really
not needed so if you're suspecting infection in a non EMU in an
immunocompromised patient and you can do a biopsy patients can tolerate it you don't have to tank them up with several
you know units of platelets then go ahead and do it said that it also
depends on your pretest probability so you have a bone marrow transplant patient who has some chronic
institutional capacities and there's really no evidence of infection you
don't have to do above C because Bob C does come with a certain risk of Nemeth oh yeah for CMV you needed because T MV
can be in the BL but unless you see the cytopathic effect you can't really make diagnoses Aspergillus is another one
because Aspergillus can colonize the airways but unless you see it invading into the tissue you can't really technically call it a
basement you look sis now this is another one of those issues where
patients are intubated in the ICU they need a biopsy and people don't want to do a biopsy because it will draw up their long it's not supported by
evidence this study 1997 that's long time alone you didn't even have high forms back
there so retrospective study of these patients who are interbedded and they
did a biopsies bleeding of more than 30 milliliters was only found in 6% pneumothorax this was about
fifteen percent which probably is a little higher than non intubated
patients which is generally ten percent but it is still acceptable mean 15 percent is with transverse eco-city
guided biopsy is so if there is a if patients are not on enormous amounts of
peeve like fifteen or twenty I think you can you can do biopsies if it's clinically indicated the thing is that
most of time and patience are intubated in the ICU on the ventilator with respiratory failure the chances that a
biopsy will change management is miniscule so that's a better reason not
to do a biopsy than to say I'm gonna drop their lung if there's a reason you want to do a biopsy and you think the
biopsy can change management go ahead and do it for me hypertension dr. L
curse you just walked out he actually brought up a good point the other day that this a an area that where research can be done and any one
of the fellows was looking for a research project there is this only one study that has looked at risk of
bleeding the trance bronchial biopsy in patients with pH I think this was from Cleveland Clinic and these were patients
they read they looked retrospectively 45 patients of pas 45 control they have
significant pH and were on oxygen there was no difference in bleeding risk but
this is a retrospective studies VA has an enormous data and you can actually tap into the national VA database and
look at all those patients say who have echo cardiogram and had pH and then
ended up having that's that it's now
common knowledge but when it came out it made big news should be stopped plavix before biopsy or not so they looked at
plavix alone aspen alone on aspirin plus plavix and the bottom line is that if
patients are on plavix and you are doing a trance bronchial biopsy you have to stop it
aspirin by itself is not a problem so stop it about five to seven days before
Hemoptysis
just a few words about this this will happen probably every now and then patients come with hemoptysis they have
a chest x-ray that looks normal they get a CT scan in the ER that looks normal and the question is if you do a bronchoscopy which most
likely you will what are the chances that you'll find something scary with a normal x-ray and a normal CT scan
there's several studies that have looked at it but these are more important so it wouldn't normally percent you'll find
something right and then lung cancer in this study with the normal chest CT with
less than 3% okay but you still do it because we have lawyers therapeutic and
Lung Cancer
koski bombs can escape I think most people know so let me just introduce
Functional Bronchoscopy
this term again it's sort of out there people are working on it it's not really mainstream what is functional
bronchoscopy it's a bronchoscopic way to test function of the airways right so we see
if we see endo bronchial obstruction like tracheal stenosis or we see central air vehicle AB do we want do we know if
it's actually functionally or physiologically important or not so
functional bronchoscopy this is a way to you know basically see if patients can
be improved by improving that area obstruction so you do bronchoscopy on
patients who are actively on CPAP and then you raise the pressure until the
air start to open and then you say okay you know add 15 centimeters of water your central air buds are open and then
you can send home on 15 centimeters of water CPAP even for a few hours if they use
its air just at night sometimes you feel better if they feel better sometimes there's an indication that actually this
central area obstruction may be maybe you know causative and not just a at
finding we are actually able to do it down here and I think even at the VA we haven't tried it but we have the ability to do
it yeah they're just lightly sedated with
with these kinds of bronchoscopy we generally like to keep patients a little awake because you want them to call if
we want them to turn their head because the area dynamics can change so we keep them little lightly sedated we'd put a
CPAP mask on and if you have a special CPAP mask for it we can put the scope through and then first we do
bronchoscopy without CPAP if they're already on CPAP or sleep apnea and they use a pressure for like 12 centimeter we
put them on 12 and see what their neighbors look like and sometimes with center ever collapse as you increase the
pressure you can actually see their elbows open up and then you say you know this is where your Airways or is stay
open because one of the problems with central air vehicle abs is not just shortness of breath it's retained secretions wheezing and coughing I can
definitely get better this is another
Morphometric Bronchoscopy
form of functional bronchoscopy called morphometric bronchoscopy in one of the meetings hypee meetings they showed a
lot of these pictures of central area obstruction from trickiest noses and
they asked the crowd how much obstruction do you think there is somebody said 30% 50% 100% you know like
all kinds of numbers because it was all subjective so this is a way you can actually find this program on the NIH
website uncoded you can take the bronchoscopic pictures and put it in there and we'll
give you a actually a way to subject to objectively measure what's called the stenosis index and you can actually
track it so say you do intervention you v's you improve this Knossos index from
better than just subjective assessment this is another form of functional bronchoscopy called ybn response imaging
YBN Response
studies were done like her or 2,000 or so in Germany mainly so when you take a
deep breath in air goes through your Airways in pure lungs then sort of vibrates your chest wall and you can
feel those vibrations right so all these are sensors on a vest and they turn the
vibrations into a picture that's the normal picture so your Airways and your lungs are nice and open
as you can see there's uniform distribution but today if dips and airway obstructions is the left mainstem
bronchus you know or airway obstruction now you can see the obstruction but how do you know how bad it is so you do a
vibration response imaging before so there's you know less airflow here less
vibrations and then you do your laser or whatever you're gonna do and you improve
it so this is almost like a te EB Doppler you know you see a valve that's obstructed now you want to see how bad
is this erotic obstruction so this is a way to objectively check the only
problem is that because of secretion you can get a lot of vibration all right
Training and Education
just maybe one minute or two minutes on one Kostka p training i like this when i
think about training and education they said the belief that all genuine education comes about to it it does not
mean and all experiences are genuinely or equally as you care if right they say
practice makes perfect it actually does not practice just makes you permanent so if you're making the same mistake over
and over again you could do it for 30 years that doesn't mean you're better you just now you know permanently
I guess disabled all right so when it comes to bronchoscopy training we know
Bronchoscopy Training
that there are two main kinds of similary you have the electronic similar to high-fidelity simulator which we have
here and we have the low fidelity simulator which doesn't always look like this but more or less the plastic model
which we have at the VA right so they did this very nice study this was like a multicenter study by dr. host where
they'd wanted to see how do fellows perform and you give them these simulators you know so they first took
these three groups of people experts intermediates and novices based on how many bronchoscopy they have done more
than 500 was expert 25 to 500 was the intermediate and novices were like these
guys when they're gonna start right so then they first gave them the brach simulator just to kind of see how they
do this you know like a dry run and they took some parameters that they're going to follow then they took the new pommy
fellows day one and they they randomized them to either conventional method which
was like okay here's the patient go ahead put the force up in and bite what you can you know that was a conventional
method versus okay you're gonna do certain number of them cost appease on the simulator before you touch the
patient that's like when the fighter pilot scream huh so overall this is not a surprise
Results
experts did better than intermediates and novices okay no surprises if they found out that after about 20
simulations on the simulator the the fellow started to look like okay they
were learning something 20 is actually a lot on a simulator you know so I don't
know but 20 simulation they started to improve in their speed they could identify the segments fell time and read
out where you just can't see anything except just the wall that's read out and the collisions with the wall so after
they had sort of gone through this early phase then they looked at these three different parameters compared the
fellows who were trained on bronchoscopy simulator versus the conventional ones
to see how they did in their first bronchoscopy and they had the procedure time then also the bronc tech was
basically had a form that he or she was filling out that yes this fellow's good that this fellow sucks you know versus
there was another bronc quality score and all these three they generally performed better okay so the moral of
the lesson or the lesson of from the story is that Brock simulators work and
this is what I recommend to all fellows who start you're not going to really learn the skill and procedural aspects
of bronchoscopy on the patient you really are not you're going to learn it on the simulator because once you start
it on the patient you have in conscious sedation you have about fifteen to twenty minutes beyond that patient start
coughing and whatnot so you really need to be you know sort of in your stride when you put the scope in the in the
patient so if you have free time during the early part of your fellowship go down there and just practice it that's
what I did in my first month of fellowship which was the sleep months I actually spend more time in the Bronx
and later than the sleep lab and it actually worked alright so we've gone through this these
Websites
are two good websites for bronchoscopy education sensual bronchoscopies and IBAs
Realworld bronchoscopy
bronchoscopies let's have one slide about the real-world bronchoscopy this is somewhat disappointing so what's
happening in the real world with bronchoscopy this is a little bit old but I don't think it's that hold so more
than 50% of the practicing pulmonologists felt that there is inadequate training and advanced
diagnostic technique including TB na okay more than 70% of the bronchoscopy
is out there practicing perform less than 100 will cost apiece per year
seventy percent felt that additional training should be provided to those who
are mainly interested and only 25% of the practicing pulmonologist were
actually doing all the procedures that are needed for board certification so
it's strange that a lot of people come to pull money because of the procedure as people out in the real world this is
the picture there was a study published in chest where they found that less than 15% of the practicing pulmonologist were
actually doing conventional TV na and less than 25% or so of the fellowship
programs were teaching conventional TV and this is early 2000s and this is conventional TV na and that study was
done because Ebers was starting to come up and a lot of those people who really didn't care about TB na but you know
they started to feel like oh let's just make sure this doesn't go away so that's that's really what it is and there are
sedation
many different validated scores so anyway just to kind of emphasize sedation really doesn't matter but can
use sedation based on what you're going to do for malignant lesions whether they're out in the lung or in the
Airways go with the needle first if you can followed by the brush do your biopsies in immunocompromised patient
itami infiltrates if you can and you're suspecting infection stop your plavix seven days before and use your free time
on the Bronx emulator especially in the early part of fellowship I think that's it
questions [Applause]
Comments
Post a Comment