antispasmodics

 The muscle relaxants listed can be divided into antispasmodic agents (primarily for musculoskeletal pain) and antispasticity agents (for spasticity from upper motor neuron lesions). Comparative efficacy is generally similar, with choice guided by side effect profiles, abuse potential, and comorbidities. Below is a concise summary of the pros, cons, risks, and recommended doses for each agent, with a comparison of benefits and risks.


Comparison: For acute musculoskeletal pain, cyclobenzaprine, methocarbamol, metaxalone, and orphenadrine have similar efficacy, with cyclobenzaprine being most sedating and carisoprodol having the highest abuse risk. For spasticity, baclofen and tizanidine are preferred, with tizanidine causing more dry mouth and baclofen more weakness. Dantrolene and chlorzoxazone carry rare but serious hepatotoxicity risks. Benzodiazepines (diazepam, clonazepam) are not recommended for routine use due to dependence risk and lack of superior efficacy. Neuromuscular blockers (atracurium, etc.) and botulinum toxin are not used for routine musculoskeletal pain or generalized spasticity in ambulatory settings.[1-3][5]

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense recommend against routine use of skeletal muscle relaxants for acute low back pain due to limited benefit and established harms.[6] The American Academy of Pediatrics notes that benefits are limited to short-term use (3–7 days), with no evidence for long-term efficacy and significant CNS side effects.[7]



Comments

Popular Posts